<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screws&#039; newshound Jobson hot on the scent again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115</link>
	<description>Privacy and the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 16:24:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rob jobson</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>rob jobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 15:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=115#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Thanks for pointing that out Patrick.

Yes, you are right.

The publisher for Bullet Proof, the story of Matt Croucher GC, is Century, Random House.

I have decided to end my correspondence with Peter Burden.

It is rather daft.

He has his view and he is entitled to it.

I have mine.

We are opposed.

Period.

Perhaps it would be best if it is left there.

Kind regards,

Robert</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for pointing that out Patrick.</p>
<p>Yes, you are right.</p>
<p>The publisher for Bullet Proof, the story of Matt Croucher GC, is Century, Random House.</p>
<p>I have decided to end my correspondence with Peter Burden.</p>
<p>It is rather daft.</p>
<p>He has his view and he is entitled to it.</p>
<p>I have mine.</p>
<p>We are opposed.</p>
<p>Period.</p>
<p>Perhaps it would be best if it is left there.</p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Robert</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 12:15:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=115#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Well spotted, Patrick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well spotted, Patrick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 17:21:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=115#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Boys, boys, boys. Whilst I agree with you Robert that accuracy is always important and good thing that Peter corrected his, I certainly hope for your sake that your publisher isn&#039;t as you have recorded: &quot;Randon House&quot; (sic) I do hope for your benefit it is Random House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boys, boys, boys. Whilst I agree with you Robert that accuracy is always important and good thing that Peter corrected his, I certainly hope for your sake that your publisher isn&#8217;t as you have recorded: &#8220;Randon House&#8221; (sic) I do hope for your benefit it is Random House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert jobson</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>robert jobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=115#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Dear Peter,

Sorry about that - yes the typo thing was a little petty. I apologize. Personally, I believe given the huge sums of taxpayers money spent on security and funding the British royals there is a genuine public interest in what they are up to.

But I have noted your point and taken it on board. However, I am not sure what purpose this made-up tosh about me being called Robert &quot;Blow&quot; Jobson makes. Just a bit of daft nonsense made up by you by the sound of it.

My offer of lunch is always open to you. I am fascinated by your obsession with the News of the World.

Having been at the paper for less than a year on a consultant contract - and having worked for all different newspapers across what used to be Fleet Street - I find the reporters and staff hard working and professional.

I am currently working on a book about Matt Croucher who was awarded the George Cross for Randon House.

Let me have your address I would love to send you a copy.

With every good wish,

Robert Jobson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Peter,</p>
<p>Sorry about that &#8211; yes the typo thing was a little petty. I apologize. Personally, I believe given the huge sums of taxpayers money spent on security and funding the British royals there is a genuine public interest in what they are up to.</p>
<p>But I have noted your point and taken it on board. However, I am not sure what purpose this made-up tosh about me being called Robert &#8220;Blow&#8221; Jobson makes. Just a bit of daft nonsense made up by you by the sound of it.</p>
<p>My offer of lunch is always open to you. I am fascinated by your obsession with the News of the World.</p>
<p>Having been at the paper for less than a year on a consultant contract &#8211; and having worked for all different newspapers across what used to be Fleet Street &#8211; I find the reporters and staff hard working and professional.</p>
<p>I am currently working on a book about Matt Croucher who was awarded the George Cross for Randon House.</p>
<p>Let me have your address I would love to send you a copy.</p>
<p>With every good wish,</p>
<p>Robert Jobson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 22:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=115#comment-47</guid>
		<description>To Robert Jobson

Thanks for spotting the typo in my last blog. I have corrected it, but of course, it doesn&#039;t affect in the slightest the point I was making. Would that the persistent and innumerbale inaccuracies in your paper were as trivial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Robert Jobson</p>
<p>Thanks for spotting the typo in my last blog. I have corrected it, but of course, it doesn&#8217;t affect in the slightest the point I was making. Would that the persistent and innumerbale inaccuracies in your paper were as trivial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robert jobson</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/115/comment-page-1#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>robert jobson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=115#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Dear Peter,

For the record Harry&#039;s new girl is called Astrid Harbord not Harborn as you state and it was the society Bible Tatler that used the term &quot;Hardcore sisters&quot; first.

I am sure an author of your standing agrees that accuracy - even on this little site - is important.

I have no idea what you are trying to imply with your reference to Robert &quot;Blow&quot; Jobson.

Please spell it out, clearly.

You seem to have a problem personally with me without ever having met me.

I am more than happy to respond to your internet mud-slinging if you would care to call.

I look forward to your next defence of recism  - it truly beggared belief.

With kind regards,

Rob Jobson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Peter,</p>
<p>For the record Harry&#8217;s new girl is called Astrid Harbord not Harborn as you state and it was the society Bible Tatler that used the term &#8220;Hardcore sisters&#8221; first.</p>
<p>I am sure an author of your standing agrees that accuracy &#8211; even on this little site &#8211; is important.</p>
<p>I have no idea what you are trying to imply with your reference to Robert &#8220;Blow&#8221; Jobson.</p>
<p>Please spell it out, clearly.</p>
<p>You seem to have a problem personally with me without ever having met me.</p>
<p>I am more than happy to respond to your internet mud-slinging if you would care to call.</p>
<p>I look forward to your next defence of recism  &#8211; it truly beggared belief.</p>
<p>With kind regards,</p>
<p>Rob Jobson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

