Archive for January, 2009

Gaza appeal – no show

The BBC’s case for not showing the Disaster Emergency Committee’s Gaza appeal is based on its duty – especially in its international broadcasting guises – to report without partiality. Given the great value of their international services in providing unslanted news they do have a case in protecting their reputation for this, unpalatable though it seems in this instance. In practical terms, of course, their refusal to air the appeal has hugely heightened the public’s awareness of it and will increase the response to the appeals put out by the non-public broadcast channels. Much more sinister is the reason Sky News refused to air it. News Corp is dependent on the goodwill of US Bankers, which requires submission to the US Jewish lobby. We can only hope that President Obama has more courage than Mr Murdoch when it comes to confronting this powerful group.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Heathrow – other options

The debate over the creation of a third runway at Heathrow is so multifaceted that it’s hard not only for concerned members of the public to come to a valid conclusion, but also the professionals involved who appear to be just as confused. Unlikely alliances have emerged. That a Labour government should back the runway, while the Tories (along with Lib-Dems and Emma Thompson) oppose it, looks bizarre in an historical context, because there is only one, traditionally conservative argument in favour, and it is largely commercial:

Popularity: 1% [?]

“Faintheart”

Anyone who’s spent a few hours in Ludlow will tell you it’s as handsome a town as you could find in Merry England (imagine all those parfit knights, codpieces and Black Death), stuffed with alleyways, timbered houses with oaken chins that jut over narrow streets and a fine castle built on a rocky mount above a gushing river. It still even has a suite of late-Georgian Assembly Rooms, as favoured by Ms J Austen and her sort when seeking social interaction. Despite being coloured an iffy crushed-blackcurrant-and-cream that Farrow & Ball must have been selling off cheap, the Assembly Rooms still serve their original function as a place of encounter and diversion in this small town. Last Saturday – a techno dance rave, next week – jazz rapper, Soweto Kinch. There are plays and concerts and other types of dances, although no White Sergeants dashing or otherwise engaged in cotillions or quadrilles or any of those high-waisted Regency dance routines where you barely have time to say, ‘Lah, me, Miss Jemma, you put me in mind of a frisky filly,’ before your partner hurls you into the solid bosom of a passing matriarch.

Popularity: 1% [?]

News International opens up the libel purse again

The Sun has been peddling porkies about the Osbournes (the ‘Ozzies’, not the ‘Georges’ this time). Battling Sharon of the aubergine hair has just walked away from the high court with a sackful of Murdoch loot after the ‘news’ paper had to dig into its coffers yet again – though maybe not so deep for old rumple-chops to notice or, at least, to care. After all, his British papers have been playing the Professional Foul for years. It’s a simple ploy; the paper thinks up a nasty, damning story claiming some spurious source about someone they think is currently out of public favour, or they shamelessly invade their privacy by sending clandestine video cameras into their private space, and sales get a nice big kick up the arse. They know that a high proportion of victims are reluctant to sue, but if they do, and win (which the victims usually do), the pay out + costs are often far lower than any of the Sun’s other, less effective sales promotions – especially when they can put juicy video clips up on their tacky website.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Bollocks to you too, Sir Christopher

Responding to a critic who had asked if the Press Complaints Commission was a ‘fig leaf’ to cover press misbehaviour, the current Chairman, Sir Christopher Meyer said, ‘It’s a load of bollocks.’

There, in a ‘nutshell’, is the truth about the PCC.

For Meyer went on to show his empathy with the Shag-Rags, over whom he is supposed to exercise control, by painting a picture of hard-nosed tabloid editors cowering behind their desks to protect themselves from the mighty wrath unleashed by the PCC when they have foolishly strayed from the path of righteousness.

I wish.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Bonding with your kids (not)

In parts of Britain, when convicts are released on parole they are issued with a piece of kit affectionately known as a ‘Peckham Rolex’, which they are obliged to wear at all times. This is a satellite tracking device, worn on the wrist, that means their exact position at any time can be monitored by the parole authorities, who can check that they are at home where they should be within their curfew hours. The wearers are ex-convicts who, having been tried in court and sentenced to a jail term, have been released before their sentence has been completed. It seems not unreasonable that they should be the subject of continued monitoring and, while it’s manifestly an intrusion on their privacy, it’s not a great price to pay for being back with their family and away from prison food.

Now a Worcestershire based company, LoK8U, preying on the paranoia of many ‘modern’ parents, have launched a ‘Peckham Rolex’ for blameless children.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Illegal Hunting of Ginger Quarry

There can be no doubt that editors at the News of the World knew exactly what they were doing when they illegally acquired and published a young army officer’s private and fairly mundane video record of his day-to-day experiences in the forces.

In it Prince Harry (who made the video) described one of his platoon, a friend and colleague, as “our little paki friend, Ahmed”, and the paper leapt at the chance to pile in and give him an almighty kicking – yet again.

Have a look at it on the Screws “family” website, if you can be bothered, and you’ll see it’s absolutely clear from the way the term is delivered that there is no malice, no implied racism, nothing to which the Pakistani soldier himself could or wanted to raise any objection.

Popularity: 1% [?]

The spread of the spread

Obesity – we will fight it on the beaches…

Our sharing, caring Government has just announced the launch of what (it claims) will be a £75m media campaign against the growing national menace of obesity. In an attempt to nip the fatties in the bud, it will especially target the young.

The campaign aims to increase awareness of the substantial health risks in carting around large lumps of surplus flab. To back it up they claim great success in reducing smoking by hammering home the health risks in their campaign over the last twenty years. However, they fail to mention the other and, I’d guess, far more potent methods which they used to discourage tobacco use (and to raise revenue) – like the huge percentage of duty payable on a pack of fags, followed more recently by the indoor smoking bar.

Popularity: 1% [?]

Where's Blair?

There was a time when Tony Blair’s voice was part of the background noise of this country. But since he spotted the danger ahead and deftly handed Gordon Brown the reins of the chariot of state as it hurtled towards the abyss, we have heard barely a squeak.

But where is he now, at a time when he should once again be strutting his stuff on the world stage? With a fresh, tragic crisis in the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, there is no sound from the Representative of the “Quartet” of interested parties – UN, EU, Russia and the US – a post to which Blair was appointed in June 2007, and in which he has not achieved any perceptible initiatives.

Popularity: 1% [?]