All Posts Tagged With: "Max Mosley"
Why are the Mail backing the Screws?
Paul Dacre’s conference on Thursday, once the Max Mosley v News of the World judgment had been handed down, must have been as rambunctious as they come. He ordered an all-out 5-page, sixteen gun broadside against the judge in the case, Mr Justice Eady and all he stood for. The judge is to be the victim of a campaign that will see him intimidated and harried until he loses the urge to make judgments that don’t match the thinking of the Nation’s greatest middle-England organ, and the thoughts of Chairman Dacre.
Star scribbler, witty, biting Quentin Letts was told to lead the attack.
Popularity: 1% [?]
The Sun is howling this morning.
With a characteristic flourish of hyperbole, twisted logic and demi-truth the Sun proclaims that
“Yesterday was a dark day for British freedom.”
Their sister ShagRag, the News of the World has just been ordered to pay £60,000 in damages and £200,000 in costs to Max Mosley. That was a lot more than their legal boss, Tom Crone had bargained for and everyone in Wapping is feeling jumpy.
They say: “A judge representing power and privilege laid down the law on what newspapers can write about powerful and privileged public figures.”
In fact a judge interpreting the law ruled that to promise to pay a woman £25,000 to film events in a private dwelling in which a number of consenting and willing adults were engaged in unconventional sex constituted a clear breach of privacy, and awarded accordingly.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Mosley’s Pyrrhic Victory
Max Mosley was awarded £60,000 in compensatory damages and £200,000 in costs in the High Court today. The News of the World were found by Mr Justice Eady to have breached his privacy by filming a private S&M session in a flat in Chelsea. The paper will also have to pay their own similar legal costs, leaving News International some £460,000 out of pocket.
It wasn’t a great result for the News of the World, but it could have been an awful lot worse. Max Mosley and his team were asking for punitive, exemplary damages which could have run to millions. For that to have succeeded, the judge would have to have deemed that the paper printed the story, with its embellishments, knowing them not to be true.
Popularity: 1% [?]
News of the World – arbiter of the nation's sexual morality?
It is a curious, if familiar paradox that the most salacious of British national newspapers should also be the most judgmental. Wearing their self-righteousness like a Victorian maiden’s bonnet, they gleefully plaster their front page with all the unedifying intimate details of a subject’s sexual behaviour, in the interests of maximum titillation of their readers, while attempting to justify it as in the interest of the public.
The case between Max Mosley and the News of the World, heard last week in the High Court, has clearly demonstrated this hypocrisy. Yesterday in his closing submissions, their counsel, Mark Warby told the court how his clients had carefully counted the number of strokes/lashes Mosley had received in their covert video of the events. Their stable-mate, The Times, reported it all this morning, adding in a jocular tone that Mosley had also received “six of the best” with a martial arts cane.
Popularity: 1% [?]
First Post article – an orgy of misunderstanding
One of my articles about Max Mosley vs. the News of the World has been published by The First Post. Here’s an excerpt, linking through to the full text at www.thefirstpost.co.uk
The News of the World never expected Max Mosley to fight his corner, says Peter Burden
Even if the News of the World does not lose the invasion of privacy action brought against the newspaper by Max Mosley, events in the High Court this week will have given its executives a serious jolt in the squishy organs.
Before launching their investigative attack on Mosley, senior editors on the paper, and their legal supremo Tom Crone, would have discussed the chances of their target pursuing a libel suit. Past form shows that however much the paper embellishes a sexual shenanigans story like this, the victims are nearly always too mortified to prolong the devastation and humiliation caused to them and their families.
Popularity: 100% [?]
Is there no end to The News of the World’s Munificence?
Last week the News of the World paid out a chunky sum to Jordan and Peter Andre for lying about their parenting skills. This week we learn that they have sent Cherie Blair a substantial sum for writing untruths about her relationship with Mrs Gordon Brown. And it could be that next week, they’ll be sending a jolly fat cheque to Max Mosley.
These are not the sort of additional costs a newspaper needs in difficult times like these, when advertising revenue is about to fall off the back of the truck. Will Master James, like the dominatrix he recently employed to set up Mosley, find it necessary to crack the whip? Will he chastise his staff for their wicked lying?
Whose backside will be striped with livid scars? “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck? Little Colin Myler? Or “Peeping Tom” Crone for letting them do it?
Popularity: 1% [?]
A BBC News slant on the Mosley case.
I think it likely that somewhere within its charter, the BBC is required to deliver news bulletins that are factual and impartial.
Nevertheless, Adam Parsons, signing off his report for Radio 4 Six O’Clock News on yesterday’s [10/7] events at the Mosley v. Screws case, opined that the case might yet set a precedent “ .. in the way high profile individuals are allowed to go about protecting their privacy,” as if this were an unsavoury ambition that applied only to the rich.
Popularity: 1% [?]
News of the World shoot Rowan Pelling’s fox
On Thursday morning, watchers in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice were buzzing at the prospect of hearing the next witness in Max Mosley v News of the Screws.
‘Woman E’ was the dominatrix who, with her husband had first approached the News of the World to tell them about an S&M orgy that was planned to happen at Max Mosley’s Chelsea basement.
Neville Thurlbeck (“Onan the Barbarian” – see blogs passim) was put in charge, and after discussing with her and his colleagues how best to exploit what they must have seen as a gift of a story, decided that, given Mosley’s parentage, a Nazi angle would be best.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Neville "Onan the Barbarian" Thurlbeck has his day in court
Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck was in Court 13 at the Royal Courts of Justice on Wednesday 9th.
The intrepid senior smut and celebrity bonk reporter for Britain’s leading ShagRag strode up to the witness box, russet beaked, with neat, implausibly nut brown hair and steely determination in his close-set eyes. He knows how to spin a tale, and he was going to show us how he could stand by it.
There was no doubt in his mind, he told the court, that despite the absence of a single specifically ‘Nazi’ feature in the hours of video footage his informant (Woman E) had shot at Max Mosley’s party, it was, ‘taken in the round’, clearly a Nazi themed party. He had even, it emerged, asked Woman E to come in close with her hidden camera to get Max Mosley giving a Nazi ‘Zieg Heil’ salute, though, to his evident disappointment, she had failed to evoke this response.
Popularity: 1% [?]
Screws editor ‘not informed’ about plan to film Mosley’s private party.
News of the World editor, Colin Myler, appeared in the High Court yesterday in the Max Mosley case. He followed a well established tradition among Screws editors of denying all knowledge of what his journalists are up to. In the same way that Andy Coulson claimed he had no idea former Royal editor, Clive Goodman was paying an (in-house) private investigator a cash bonus to tap the royal phones, Myler says he didn’t know that Neville (Onan the Barbarian) Thurlbeck was fitting up ‘Woman E’ (as she is referred to in the case) with a video camera to film Mosley’s private party. For goodness sake! How long has he known Onan Thurlbeck? He surely knew that Thurlbeck had agreed that Woman E would be receiving a large amount of money for helping to create the story – at least to embellish it enough to really destroy Mosley and his family’s feelings, thus meriting a front page splash.
Popularity: 1% [?]
