<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peter Burden &#187; Natalie Rowe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/natalie-rowe/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterburden.net</link>
	<description>Privacy and the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>COLATERAL DAMAGE IN THE COULSON CASE&#8230;&#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/764</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/764#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 10:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Coulson' Stuart Kuttner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture Media Sport Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Harris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Rowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samantha Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[William Hague]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The real target of the New York Times in their reopening of the Coulson affair, if not Rupert Murdoch himself, is Les Hinton, an Englishman (now naturalised American) in New York, and currently CEO of Dow Jones, publishers of the Wall Street Journal.
In January 2007,  two men working for the News of the World were [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The real target of the <em>New York Times</em> in their reopening of the Coulson affair, if not Rupert Murdoch himself, is Les Hinton, an Englishman (now naturalised American) in New York, and currently CEO of Dow Jones, publishers of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>.</p>
<p>In January 2007,  two men working for the <em>News of the World</em> were jailed for illegal phone-hacking, while Hinton was Executive Chairman of <em>Screws </em>owners, News International in London.</p>
<p>He is a deeply experienced, hard-nosed, long-serving, loyal Murdoch henchman. When I was researching for my book, <em>News of the world? Fake Sheikhs &amp; Royal Trappings</em>, I was told by very well placed associates of the then NI chairman that knowledge of the illegal practices at the <em>News of the World</em> would certainly have stretched right up to Les Hinton, and nothing he has said since has convinced me otherwise. When the Commons Culture Media Sport Committee took evidence from him last autumn during their inquiry into the phone-hacking scandal, while denying any knowledge, his nervousness and body-language failed to convince anyone of the innocence he professed of any involvement in the paper’s illegal activities.</p>
<p>The <em>NYT </em>is famously involved in a pretty desperate circulation war with the <em>Wall Street Journal</em>, and to bring about its CEO’s disgrace would be a very useful feather in its cap in a nation which is even more anti-News Corp than this one.</p>
<p>If the police and the two parliamentary committees now involved do manage to make the truth (which is so obvious to all observers) stand up, Les Hinton’s head will be on the railing spikes alongside Andy Coulson’s and that of sacked former managing editor, Stuart Kuttner.</p>
<p>David Cameron is getting most of the stick for his lack of judgement in appointing a man so obviously tainted as Andy Coulson, but it should be remembered that he was reacting to the urging of his then Shadow Chancellor, George Osborne.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Osborne already had a relationship with Coulson, encompassing some apparently bizarre anomalies.  This friendship went back several years, to autumn 2005, just before the annual conference, when Coulson ran a front page splash in the <em>Screws</em>…<br />
   <strong><em>TOP TORY, COKE AND THE HOOKER</em></strong><br />
   Illustrated with pictures of the then unflawed Shadow Chancellor, it claimed that eleven years before, while he was at Oxford, Osborne was said, without any convincing corroboration, to have looked on while ‘dominatrix’ hooker, Natalie Rowe, snorted a line of coke. Her boyfriend, an unnamed friend of Osborne’s had gone on to become an addict, the report alleged.<br />
   It was, on closer inspection, an archetypal <em>Screws</em> non-story, devoid of any hard content, worded so as to avoid any come-back, but just salacious enough to justify its front page status, and, of course, devoid of any genuine revelations about the politician, beyond the fact that in his youth he’d had a friend who knew a prostitute and who’d become addicted to an unspecified drug.<br />
   When the story appeared, I wasn’t the only one struck, not by the damage that might have been done to the young politician, but by how much good it had done him. After all, the story didn’t say George himself had done anything at all.<br />
   He hadn’t snorted the coke, and he hadn’t taken advantage of the hooker’s professional skills, ‘dominatrix’ or otherwise. But it did make him look, by association, as if he’d lived a little and had a touch of grubby humanity to him, which went a long way to counter the unsexy image of a choir-boy-coiffed, goody-two-shoes, that must have been causing concern in the Party’s image department.<br />
   In a well-constructed profile of Coulson in the <em>Guardian</em>, John Harris noted that Osborne and Coulson had ‘got on well’, even while discussing the Screws ‘exposé’, although, at the time the article was published, the people around Osborne told Harris that he was suffering severe tummy rumbles and telling everyone how upset he was.<br />
   Well, he would, wouldn’t he?<br />
   There’d be little point in constructing a subtle piece of well-spun double-bluff, then rushing around telling people how chuffed about it you were. For this astutely ironic act of spin, Andy established his credentials with Osborne and, at least covertly, made his political allegiance known.<br />
George and Andy were still in touch after Andy’s resignation from the <em>Screws</em> for his role in the Royal phone hacking debacle, and it was then that Osborne persuaded his boss that Coulson was just the man to give the white-tie-and-tails Bullingdon folk some much-needed street cred among the elusive middle ground voters.</p>
<p>            No doubt it was Coulson’s skill in devising sophisticated reverse/negative spin that attracted Osborne and maybe convinced Cameron. A good example of this was evident this year when it was ‘leaked’ that Samantha Cameron had once voted Green as a student.</p>
<p>Pretending  that the leak was alarming to them, Cameron’s camp knew that it certainly hadn’t done any damage and it would do a great deal of positive good in suggesting David Cameron’s broadness of vision and sympathy with those beyond the standard Tory pale.</p>
<p>However, it’s likely that the government will soon have to manage without this gifted manipulator of information, and perhaps William Hague won’t be too sorry about that.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=764&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/764/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GEORGE AND THE DOMINATRIX</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/585</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/585#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Coulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Rowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nigel Farrage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oleg Deripaska]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tory chances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Osborne is widely perceived by many potential conservative voters as the wobbly plank in David Cameron’s platform.
   It isn’t simply that Osborne looks and sounds too young and inexperienced ; there is also an air of supercilious knowingness about him which effectively trumps Cameron’s sincerity.
   He had a chance to show depth and honesty [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Osborne is widely perceived by many potential conservative voters as the wobbly plank in David Cameron’s platform.<br />
   It isn’t simply that Osborne looks and sounds too young and inexperienced ; there is also an air of supercilious knowingness about him which effectively trumps Cameron’s sincerity.<br />
   He had a chance to show depth and honesty in autumn 2008, the day he had delivered one of his most convincing speeches to the party conference at a time when the full scale of the disastrous mess the bankers had made for us all was still emerging. On television that evening he was presented with a critical moment at which he could have shown sincerity, humility and credibility (if he possessed such qualities).<br />
   He gave a long, wide-ranging interview about the banking crisis, in which he could have owned up to the conservatives’ share of the blame.<br />
   But at no point did he acknowledge or apologise for his party’s absence of criticism of the bankers’ behaviour, or his own silence on the government’s lack of control over the excessive risks being taken by most of Britain’s larger financial institutions.<br />
   Here was a moment when he could have shown courage, by admitting to the electorate, “We should have done more &#8211; much more &#8211; but we didn’t.”</p>
<p>Another aspect of the liability which Osborne represents for his party lies in the origin of his very close relationship with Andy Coulson, the disgraced former editor of the News of the World.<br />
   This friendship goes back several years, to autumn 2005, just before the annual conference, when Coulson ran a front page splash in the Screws…<br />
   <em><strong>TOP TORY, COKE AND THE HOOKER</strong></em><br />
   Illustrated with pictures of the angel-faced Shadow Chancellor, it claimed that eleven years before, while he was at Oxford, the then flawless Osborne was said, without any convincing corroboration, to have looked on while ‘dominatrix’ hooker, Natalie Rowe, snorted a line of coke. Her boyfriend, an unnamed friend of Osborne’s had gone on to become an addict, the report alleged.<br />
   It was, on closer inspection, an archetypal Screws non-story, devoid of any hard content, worded so as to avoid any come-back, but just salacious enough to justify its front page status, and, of course, devoid of any genuine revelations about the politician, beyond the fact that in his youth he’d had a friend who knew a prostitute and who’d become addicted to an unspecified drug.<br />
   When the story appeared, I remember being struck not by the damage that might have been done to the ambitious young politician, but by how much good it had done him. After all, the story didn’t say George himself had actually done anything at all.<br />
   He hadn’t snorted the coke, and he hadn’t taken advantage of the hooker’s professional skills, ‘dominatrix’ or otherwise. But it did make him look, by association, as if he’d lived a bit and had a touch of grubby humanity to him, which went a long way to counter the unsexy image of a choir-boy-coiffed goody-two-shoes, that must have been causing concern in the Party’s image department.<br />
   In a well-constructed profile of Coulson in the Guardian, John Harris noted that Osborne and Coulson had ‘got on well’, even while discussing the Screws ‘exposé’, although, at the time the article was published, the people around Osborne told Harris that he was suffering severe tummy rumbles and telling everyone how upset he was.<br />
   Well, he would, wouldn’t he?<br />
   There’d be little point in constructing a subtle piece of well-spun double-bluff, then rushing around telling people how chuffed about it you were. For this astutely ironic act of spin, Andy established his credentials with Osborne and, at least covertly, made his political allegiance known.<br />
George and Andy were still in touch after Andy’s resignation from the Screws for his role in the Royal phone hacking debacle, and it was then that Osborne persuaded his boss that Coulson was just the man to give the white-tie-and-tails Bullingdon folk some much-needed street cred among the elusive middle ground voters.</p>
<p>Osborne no doubt sees it as part of his job to get close to people of great wealth and commercial power, as evidenced by his presence in Corfu in Autumn 2008, when he skipped between three monster yachts belonging to the Murdochs, Rupert’s son-in-law Matthew Freud, and Russian mega-oligarch, Oleg Deripaska, from whom he famously failed to extract a donation (while crapping on his old friendship with the mightily oofy Nathaniel Rothschild). He happily allowed himself to be pampered and wooed by Ole Rumplechops and his Titian-tressed larrikin, Rebekah Brooks, while at home Andy Coulson strengthened the bonds between the Tories and News Corp.<br />
   This relationship has been almost irrevocably sealed by the Sun’s conversion to the Conservative cause, the party’s concurrence with Murdoch briefing on the BBC, and the continuing, high risk loyalty being shown to Coulson despite all the outrageous lapses of memory and lacunae of knowledge he displayed in front of the Commons Culture Media &amp; Sport Committee last summer.<br />
   It is this relationship, more than anything Gordon does or doesn’t do, that will do the real damage to Cameron’s electoral chances among the voters that matter &#8211; those who take the trouble to scrutinise and weigh the issues before they vote, rather than those who simply vote along tribal lines.<br />
   It’s too late re-instate Ken Clarke where he belongs, which would appease a lot of the wavering conservative support (while the Europhobes will still vote for Cameron, rather than Nigel Farrago.)<br />
   But it’s not too late to ask Coulson to go.<br />
   If the Tories don’t dump him, but still get in, are they ready to risk the great flock of chickens out there, flapping their wings before coming home to roost on Coulson’s back, come the autumn?</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=585&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/585/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In their valiant quest for truth, the News of the World have resuscitated a three year old non-story &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/68</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/68#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 09:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Coulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[George Osborne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natalie Rowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=68</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In autumn 2005, just before the annual Tory Party Conference, Screws editor Andy Coulson ran a front page splash&#8230;
TOP TORY, COKE AND THE HOOKER
Illustrated with pictures of angel-faced Shadow Chancellor, George Osborne, it claimed that eleven years before, while he was at Oxford, the then flawless Osborne was said, without any convincing corroboration, to have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">In autumn 2005, just before the annual Tory Party Conference, Screws editor Andy Coulson ran a front page splash&#8230;</p>
<p>TOP TORY, COKE AND THE HOOKER</p>
<p>Illustrated with pictures of angel-faced Shadow Chancellor, George Osborne, it claimed that eleven years before, while he was at Oxford, the then flawless Osborne was said, without any convincing corroboration, to have been watched by ‘dominatrix’ hooker, Natalie Rowe, snorting a line of coke. Her boyfriend, an unnamed friend of Osborne’s had gone on to become an addict, the report alleged.<span id="more-68"></span></p>
<p>It was, on closer inspection, an archetypal Screws non-story, devoid of any hard content, carefully worded to avoid any serious come-back, but just salacious enough to justify its front page status, and, of course, devoid of any genuine revelations about the politician, beyond the fact that in his youth he’d had a friend who knew a prostitute and who’d become addicted to an unspecified drug.</p>
<p>Now, as the fuss over the non-event of Oleg Deripaska not giving the Tories any money fades away, the Screws feebly try to fan the flames by reviving their fatuous story. This time, one of their hardened old smut writers, Sara Nuwar has cobbled together a string of fresh “quotes” from Natalie, all made up since the original piece appeared three years ago. As always, the “revelations” are full of sloppy non-sequiturs and contradictions. Natalie, a hooker allegedly brought in to brighten up Bullingdon Club meetings (never mentioned in the 2005 story), “tells” Ms Nuwar  ‘I felt an empathy with George because we were both outsiders.’ In the sense that he had been voted into the Bullingdon and she had not?</p>
<p>She offers specious explanations for the other members considering George socially inferior and teasing him, while claiming what great “pals” they all were. Yet again a clumsy attempt is made to connect Osborne with cocaine, without categorically stating he used the stuff. No doubt Natalie met young Osborne at a party for which she’d been engaged as a little erotic light relief, and perhaps she managed to add to whatever purse she received then by taking a few more £K from the Screws for helping to concoct yesterday’s absurd 2-page spread. If she&#8217;s lucky, she might get another bite of the cherry if Osborne becomes Chancellor of the Exchequer in a few years time.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=68&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/68/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

