All Posts Tagged With: "Neville Thurlbeck"

Will the Murdochs have to open their Wallets – again – for Max Clifford

News International boss, Rebekah Brooks has stamped her little foot, shaken her ginger curls and says she jolly well won’t go to the Houses of Parliament to tell the Culture, Media & Sport Committee that everyone in Wapping knew who was engaged in illegal “news” gathering. Pity, because she could also have told them why managing editor and senior spell-binder at the Screws, Stuart Kuttner was sacked last summer, just when the Guardian broke the story of the Screws’ out of court settlement with Gordon Taylor for hacking into his voicemails.
She might have been able to explain why, without any of the management at the paper (they say) being aware of phone hacking by Glenn Mulcaire, they thought they were liable for what Mulcaire had done without their knowlegde or involvement. After all the paper’s head legal honcho, Tom Crone suggested to the Committee last July that Mulcaire was working for other papers. On that basis, he could have hacked Gordon’s phone on behalf of the Sunday Mirror or one of the Dirty Des rags. If they didn’t even know it was going on – and they categorically denied that they did – why should they have coughed up before Gordon Taylor even got them to court?
    But the police had an email which made it clear that a transcript of Mulcaire’s interceptions on Taylor’s phone had been made by Screws reporter, Ross Hindley (AKA: Ross Hall) for senior shag hack, Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck. (You might ask why the police didn’t pursue this prima facie evidence of law-breaking at the Screws by people other than fall guys Goodman and Mulcaire.)
Maybe Kuttner’s firing was a response by James Murdoch, his ultimate boss in the UK, to the increasing filthiness of the paper’s reputation under Kuttner’s regime and the vast sums of money gushing down the Screws loos, thanks to pay-offs to Max Mosley, Gordon Taylor, Barry George and even £800K to one of their own, maligned ex-employees, Matt Driscoll (to name a few of many, not to mention Goodman and Mulcaire). And shortly they may well have to dig deep for veteran media warrior, Max Clifford, whose case against the paper for invasion of privacy gets underway early next month (if the paper doesn’t settle before). It seems unlikely, though, that Max Clifford would be ready to sign a non-disclosure agreement, like the one Taylor did. So maybe the paper will be forced to take its chances in court, where Clifford’s lawyers (and the intelligent press) will have a field day. I can’t wait.
Who’s next?

Popularity: 6% [?]

THE END OF THE AFFAIR – DO THE MURDOCHS STILL LOVE THE SCREWS?

It would be surprising if Rupert ‘Rumplechops’ Murdoch did not have a soft spot for the News of the World; after all, the old tart gave him his first big break in international newspaper publishing, which he now dominates from the offices of the Wall Street Journal – a very long way from the seedy Bouverie Street newsroom he took over back in 1969. Nevertheless, when he first made her acquaintance, buying the notorious ShagRag from under Robert Maxwell’s acquisitive hooter, she was, at least, an honest old tart, with great earning potential.
The tales of rapacious vicars, strippers at policemen’s balls and philandering politicians were more or less true. But over the last 25 years, under the evil influence of men like Stuart Kuttner, recently sacked managing editor, backed up by truth-hating hacks like Trevor Kempson, Mazher Mahmood and Neville Thurlbeck, the paper has utterly abandoned the principles expressed in its 1843 founding mission statement – “Our motto is the truth; our practice is the fearless advocacy of the truth,”  perhaps to be replaced by a quote from former news editor, Greg Miskiw: “This is what we do; we go out and destroy other people’s lives.”
Now the culture of lying and fabrication which is endemic in the newsroom is beginning to alienate a better educated public and lose sales. And it’s costing enough in damages and legal fees to make a big dent in the paper’s formerly impressive earnings.
          Tom Crone, head legal honcho at Fort Wapping must be getting nervous, sharpening his pencils and checking the emergency exits in preparation for a long campaign in the trenches. Will his new boss, Rebekah TestaRossa come and hold his sweaty hand? Or will she, along with her boss, Master James, be glad to see the back of the liability and steaming pile of ordure that the tacky little ShagRag has become?
          In the last year or so, the paper’s had a lot of big bills to pay for damages and legal fees. The Max Mosley fiasco cost them somewhere between £500k and £1m. They settled getting on for £1m with Gordon Taylor and two of his colleagues at the Professional Footballers’ Association for hacking into their voicemails. A writ from Max Clifford and Sky Andrew for more phone hacking and invasion of pivacy is hovering. In Paris a judge d’instruction is preparing a prosecution against the paper, its editor, Colin Myler, the reporter, Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck, and their lawyers, Farrers for publishing and sending copies of the paper containing details of Max Mosley’s private life to the FIA in Paris, which is a criminal offence in France.
          The paper is a source of a great embarrassment to James Murdoch, who must feel that the corporation which publishes the WSJ and wants to be taken seriously shouldn’t be messing about in the gutter with an organ at least as disreputable as the National Enquirer in the US.
          Kuttner has had his marching orders; Mazher Mahmood’s by-line is a rare sight these days; even Thurlbeck’s not getting the space he used to.  Following the paper’s admission that they had paid off Gordon Taylor (with a far bigger sum than Max Mosley was awarded in the High Court), the extraordinary display of dissembling put on by Crone, Myler, Kuttner and former editor Andy Coulson for the Commons Culture, Media, Sport Committee must have shoved the Screws public image even deeper into the Wapping mud.
          Don’t be surprised to see more changes; young Murdoch won’t want to live with his father’s old flame for ever.

Popularity: 3% [?]

The Screws, the email and the ex-editor's nephew

Among the muddle-headed ramblings that senior executives of the News of the World offered by way of evidence to the Commons Culture Media Sport Committee on July 21st, there was at least one small grain of accuracy, although the details of even that are open to question.

          Tom Crone, head legal honcho at the Screws, was deftly ducking his way through some incisive questioning by CMS Committee chairman, John Whittingdale, who wanted to know what had happened to an email sent by a “junior reporter” to Private Investigator, Glenn Mulcaire.

          This email had been used by lawyers acting for PFA boss, Gordon Taylor in their action against the Screws for invasion of privacy. It contained a transcript of a message left on Taylor’s voicemail. This transcript had been prepared by the junior reporter and returned to Glenn Mulcaire with the heading, “Hello, this is the transcript for Neville,” clearly referring to senior reporter Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck who was working on the story.

          It will come as no surprise, though, that when Mr Crone questioned Thurlbeck about it, the position was that, “He had never seen that email, nor had any knowledge of it.  He says that he was brought into the relevant editorial project, the story, at the end of the story and his task was to go and knock on the door of one of the story’s subjects, which was either in Blackburn or Manchester, and put the essence of the story to the person in order to get their comments, which is mostly standard practice in what we do.”

          Coincidentally , it’s not the first time Thurlbeck has used this excuse for his extraordinarily hazy memory of major events. He gave exactly the same one when asked in the Mosley case if he knew the origin of a verbatim transcript of a voicemail message left by Prince William for Prince Harry. He had, amazingly, absolutely no idea that the story could have been obtained by illegal means, much as Andy Coulson told the CMS Committee an hour or so after Crone gave evidence last month.

          Crone went on to say, “When I spoke to (Thurlbeck) the first time he said he was briefed by one of our executives, Greg Miskiw who was then based in Manchester.  He subsequently came back to me and said that he had refreshed his memory and in fact it could not have been Greg Miskiw, because Greg Miskiw left the News of the World on 30 June 2005, which was the day after that email was created. (My italics) He had worked out his redundancy package, I think, a week or two weeks before that, and he was no longer on active duty.  Neville Thurlbeck told me that his refreshed memory told him that in fact the briefing that he received was from the London news desk.”

          John Whittingdale went on to ask if the London news desk was aware of the contents of this email.

          To which Crone replied, “Well, no, I went to speak to the relevant person at the London news desk who told me that he had no knowledge of the email and he had never seen it.”

          So Neville Thurlbeck was sent off to ask about a story based on a transcript which none of them were aware of?

          Crone admitted, “I do not know whether the story entirely came from the transcript; but certainly part of it must have come from the transcript, yes.”

          This was, of course, all standard Screws obfuscation tactics. 

          Crone said he had also questioned the junior reporter, who also had little recollection of the email and transcript.  But Crone did know that about this time, he had only just become a reporter. “Prior to that actually I think he had been a messenger and he was being trained up on the floor.  In the early weeks and months of him being trained up as a reporter what he did more than anything else was transcribe tapes of journalists’ interviews – whatever tapes were relevant to the News of the World.  He does not particularly remember this job in any detail; he does not remember who asked him to do it; and he does not remember any follow-up from it.  He saw the email and he accepts that he sent the transcript where the email says he sent it.”

          If the CMS committee had wanted to question the junior reporter, they would have found that in April of this year he left the paper, having filed several key stories about the fatal stabbings of London teenagers, Jimmy Mizen and Robert Knox.

          It seems almost too absurd that the Committee should be expected seriously to believe that a young reporter would have no recollection of transcribing an illegally obtained message left on the voicemail of the boss of the Professional Footballers’ Association.  And this young reporter, Ross Hall is no fool. He comes from a journalistic background, at least to the extent that his uncle, Phil Hall, now a leading PR, is a former editor of the News of the World.

          One of his colleagues told me that in the spring – about the same time managing editor Stuart Kuttner was learning about involuntary plans for his future – Ross Hall decided that he was fed up with working for the Screws, and took off to travel round the world.

          It may be a simple coincidence that his companion, a high profile young free-lancer also left the Sunday Mirror at exactly the same time and hasn’t worked in London since.

          So the one person who can say definitively who did or didn’t see the email which ultimately cost the Screws over £700k in damages and costs paid to Gordon Taylor is conveniently unavailable for some months to come.

          And Ross Hall’s disillusionment with Britain’s leading ShagRag wasn’t so great that it stopped him filing a little puff, disguised as a travel piece in the Screws, for the safari lodge where he was staying in Botswana in April.

          I wonder who he’ll be working for when he gets back from his travels.

Popularity: 3% [?]

The Screws and the Met: A Special Relationship?

Like most reasonable folk that live in Britain, I admire and am grateful for the commitment and self-sacrifice made by those tens of thousands of genuinely public-spirited policemen who do what they can to maintain the rule of law in this country.

It’s right that exceptional acts of personal bravery shown by individual police officers in the exercise of their job should be recognised and honoured, as indeed they are at the annual Police Bravery Awards ceremony. But for some of the recipients of these awards it must be disappointing that this event should be deeply tainted by a commercial sponsor, particularly one so deficient in integrity and moral purpose as the Sun newspaper.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Neville 'Onan the Barbarian' Thurlbeck and the lady in the Rag Top

 Lucky for Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck, AKA the “Hanking Wack” and chief composer of smut and bollocks at the Screws of the World, no one got a shot of him on his little jolly in his ‘classic’ Mercedes sports car last summer. But he was spotted at the picturesque Hotel de France in Chinon, at the centre of the Loire wine growing region in France, indeed, even boasted to English punters of how he had set up the illegal to raid on Max Mosley’s private party last year, and tried to blackmail and bully the women involved into backing up false claims that Mosley had insisted on a Nazi theme.

          Why, I wonder, was his companion, a woman freezing in the passenger seat of his ‘rag-top’, not his long-suffering wife, Estelle, but a young British-Asian woman, who claimed she worked for the Crown Prosecution Service?

          What was her function? Is she on Onan’s extensive payroll of informers and tattle tellers?

          She can’t surely have come along to watch him manipulate himself, as he did a few years ago after begging the owners of a Dorset guest house to let him watch them having sex. He was trying to sting them into providing a couple of pages of smut for his rag, but got a bit carried away and was caught in flagrante on video – the stinger stung.

Popularity: 2% [?]

The Fake Sheikh's fake sting in the slums of Mumbai

Just when we thought he’d finally run out of bad ideas, Mazher Mahmood, clapped out “Investigations Editor” of the News of the Screws, has managed to squeeze his by-line on to the front page of the notorious Shag Rag once more.  No doubt in the wake of Madonna’s failed attempt to adopt a second child in Malawi, the counterfeit sheikh has concocted a massively spurious claim that Indian child “Slumdog” star, Rubina Ali was offered ‘for sale’ by her dad, Rafiq Qureshi.

Popularity: 2% [?]

The News of the World run by bullies and liars – It's official!

Yesterday the Employment Tribunal at Stratford, East London dealt a well-deserved blow to the already noxious reputation of the News of the World when they found in favour of former senior sports writer, Matt Driscoll. He had claimed unfair dismissal and disability discrimination by the newspaper; the tribunal will hold a further hearing early in the new year to determine compensation to be paid by the paper.

The tribunal heard that Matt Driscoll had since 1997 been a well-thought of sports journalist on the News of the World. He’d been promoted in 2001 by his boss, Mike Dunn to chief sports features writer. But incoming editor, Andy Coulson, had taken against him, and Driscoll was subjected to a series of baseless disciplinary hearings to force him to resign. As a result he developed a stress-related illness, on the basis of which Coulson and his managing editor, Stuart Kuttner dismissed him. Driscoll has been unable to work since.

Popularity: 3% [?]

Mosley wants to set up a Libel Fund for the less rich

Max Mosley is pursuing several libel actions around Europe against publications who were careless enough to repeat the News of the World’s allegations that he had engaged five dominatrices for a Nazi style orgy – now believed by most of us in court to have been, beyond doubt, invented by Screws hack, Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck.

Mosley has suggested that he might use some of the proceeds of these libel actions (and it’s likely he’ll win several of them) to set up a fund so that those less rich than he could also pursue the Wapping lie-factory next time they transgress.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Mosley’s Pyrrhic Victory

Max Mosley was awarded £60,000 in compensatory damages and £200,000 in costs in the High Court today. The News of the World were found by Mr Justice Eady to have breached his privacy by filming a private S&M session in a flat in Chelsea. The paper will also have to pay their own similar legal costs, leaving News International some £460,000 out of pocket.

It wasn’t a great result for the News of the World, but it could have been an awful lot worse. Max Mosley and his team were asking for punitive, exemplary damages which could have run to millions. For that to have succeeded, the judge would have to have deemed that the paper printed the story, with its embellishments, knowing them not to be true.

Popularity: 2% [?]

News of the World – arbiter of the nation's sexual morality?

It is a curious, if familiar paradox that the most salacious of British national newspapers should also be the most judgmental. Wearing their self-righteousness like a Victorian maiden’s bonnet, they gleefully plaster their front page with all the unedifying intimate details of a subject’s sexual behaviour, in the interests of maximum titillation of their readers, while attempting to justify it as in the interest of the public.

The case between Max Mosley and the News of the World, heard last week in the High Court, has clearly demonstrated this hypocrisy. Yesterday in his closing submissions, their counsel, Mark Warby told the court how his clients had carefully counted the number of strokes/lashes Mosley had received in their covert video of the events. Their stable-mate, The Times, reported it all this morning, adding in a jocular tone that Mosley had also received “six of the best” with a martial arts cane.

Popularity: 2% [?]