<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Peter Burden &#187; News of the World</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/news-of-the-world/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.peterburden.net</link>
	<description>Privacy and the media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:27:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Bye Bye Peta Buscombe &#8211; The Scourge of the Screws?</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/966</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/966#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 10:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Peta Buscombe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press Complaints Commission]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What kind of desperate vanity would have induced anyone  to take over from the former incumbent, Sir Christoper &#8220;Loose Cannon&#8221; Meyer, the thankless task of running the least effective &#8220;self-regulatory&#8221; body in the country?
Baroness Peta Buscombe was mad to take over the Cup of Hemlock that is the  Chair of the Press Complaints Commission, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of desperate vanity would have induced anyone  to take over from the former incumbent, Sir Christoper &#8220;Loose Cannon&#8221; Meyer, the thankless task of running the least effective &#8220;self-regulatory&#8221; body in the country?</p>
<p>Baroness Peta Buscombe was mad to take over the Cup of Hemlock that is the  Chair of the Press Complaints Commission, and now she&#8217;s paying the price.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s cocked up the job from start to finish, been bamboozled by the Screws,  sued for libel by a leading media lawyer, made herself look ridiculous and &#8211; one good thing &#8211; she&#8217;s almost certainly brought this useless institution to the point of its overdue execution.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=966&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/966/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the MPs should have asked James Murdoch &#8230;..</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/959</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/959#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jul 2011 07:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colin Myler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Culture Media Sport Committee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kuttner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mr Murdoch, you have conceded that Gordon Taylor had to be paid because his phone had been hacked by Muclaire on behalf of the News of the World.
Your executives Myler, Crone, Kuttner, Coulson, Hinton all told the CMS committee in 2009 that there had only been one rogue reporter, Clive Goodman – the Royal editor [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Mr Murdoch, you have conceded that Gordon Taylor had to be paid because his phone had been hacked by Muclaire on behalf of the News of the World.</em></p>
<p><em>Your executives Myler, Crone, Kuttner, Coulson, Hinton all told the CMS committee in 2009 that there had only been one rogue reporter, Clive Goodman – the Royal editor – and continued asserting this, as did you, right up until 2010.</em></p>
<p><em>Are you telling us that you and your executives believed that the extensive phone hacking of Gordon Taylor and his assistants by Mulcaire was ordered by Clive Goodman, the one rogue reporter?</em></p>
<p><em>And did they (and you) believe that Goodman also instructed Mulcaire to hack into the phones of Skylet Andrew (a footballers’ agent), Simon Hughes, and Max Clifford, all of whom were named as victims of Mulcaire’s hacking when he was convicted in January 2007?</em></p>
<p><em>If they didn’t believe this (and they could not possibly have believed it), they <strong>all lied</strong> to Parliament when they re-asserted their claim that Goodman was the only guilty reporter.</em></p>
<p>The obfuscation, the hesitation, the avoidance of direct answers, the high pitched protesting whine, as well as the inconsistency of fact when James Murdoch appeared before the committee on Tuesday were all convincing indicators that he too has now lied to parliament.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=959&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/959/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Farewell, Testarossa. You had the fun and now you&#8217;ve paid the price.</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/950</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/950#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 15:44:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charley Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gossamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[orgy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebekah Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sacked]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=950</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now that Rebekah Brooks has walked the Wapping plank, will anyone employ her again? Venal, dishonest bully, who can&#8217;t really write a good sentence &#8211; what was she doing in the CEO&#8217;s job at NI? It&#8217;s unlikely she and her husband, Charley Bonker Brooks, former race-horse trainer (manque) former purveyor of women&#8217;s underwear and wannabe writer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that Rebekah Brooks has walked the Wapping plank, will anyone employ her again? Venal, dishonest bully, who can&#8217;t really write a good sentence &#8211; what was she doing in the CEO&#8217;s job at NI? It&#8217;s unlikely she and her husband, Charley Bonker Brooks, former race-horse trainer (manque) former purveyor of women&#8217;s underwear and wannabe writer (lots of wanna, not much be) will be able to run the Wapping Jet on his book sales. Charley&#8217;s a jolly chap, but he couldn&#8217;t write his way out of a gossamer bag.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=950&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/950/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How many more Screws collars will be felt?</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/943</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/943#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 07:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kuttner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Crone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=943</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The police seized a reported 11,000 documents from Glenn Mulcaire&#8217;s office when they raided it in August 2006. There can be no question that the information held within these documents would have been known by journalists at the paper, as well as management, who paid Mulcaire. This information included details of the hacking of Milly [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The police seized a reported 11,000 documents from Glenn Mulcaire&#8217;s office when they raided it in August 2006. There can be no question that the information held within these documents would have been known by journalists at the paper, as well as management, who paid Mulcaire. This information included details of the hacking of Milly Dowler&#8217;s phone.</p>
<p>News International have now &#8220;admitted&#8221; they have had this information for four years (at least five, in fact). I watched Andy Coulson (former editor) Colin Myler (current editor), Stuart Kuttner (managing editor/chief dirty tricks organiser for twenty years and at least 8 editors) and Tom Crone (head legal honcho) of the News of the World tell a parliamentary committee that there was absolutley no further evidence of phone hacking, and that Clive Goodman (jailed Royal claptrapper) was a lone rogue reporter. </p>
<p>They were all lying&#8230;..</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how I reported it at the time &#8230;</p>
<div><strong><em>A case for waterboarding?</em></strong></div>
<div><strong><em></em></strong> </div>
<div>July 22nd, 2009</div>
<div id="filed-a-case-for-waterboarding" style="DISPLAY: none">
<div>Tags: <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/andy-coulson">Andy Coulson</a> • <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/colin-myler">Colin Myler</a> • <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/culture-media-sport-commitee">Culture Media Sport Commitee</a> • <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/news-of-the-world">News of the World</a> • <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/stuart-kuttner">Stuart Kuttner</a> • <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/tom-crone">Tom Crone</a> • <a rel="tag" href="http://www.peterburden.net/archives/tag/waterboarding">waterboarding</a></div>
</div>
<div>
<p>The MPs on the Culture, Media, Sport Committee must have been asking themselves yesterday, what on earth a reasonable person could do when confronted with three hardened, well-rehearsed liars, all desperate to avoid having their collars felt?</p>
<p>Experienced interpreters of body-language can enjoy a revealing session by tuning into the video-archive of yesterday’s oral evidence in front of the CMS Committee in Portcullis House.</p>
<p><strong><em>Andy Coulson</em></strong> – bullish, assertive, knowing his best defence is attack, with a dash of cheeky chappy charm.</p>
<p><strong><em>Tom Crone</em></strong> – for once not so sure of his ground, nervously cutting in a little too quickly when little Colin Myler gets it wrong, with a giveaway sheen of sweat on the strong, ruddy features.</p>
<p><strong><em>Stuart Kuttner</em></strong> – <em>eau de nil</em>, haunted, shaking like an aspen, fiddling, fiddling, picking up his water, putting it down undrunk, rearranging files and pens, moving his large spectacles from side to side – meaning, for those who speak body language, that he is shitting himself; that after an ignominious dismissal by … who? Which Mr Murdoch? … his long, wicked career at the <em>Screws</em> is well and truly on the skids.</p>
<p>Little <strong><em>Colin Myler</em></strong> doesn’t need to lie. He wasn’t there when events at the centre of this enquiry took place. [When he’d arrived, he did arrange a few training sessions in act-cleaning-up for his newsroom hacks. But did Mazhher Mahmood and Neville “Onan the Barbarian” Thurlbeck attend? From the continuing and relentless shoddiness of their output, it seems they were excused – or just weren’t paying attention.]  <span id="more-271"> </span></p>
<p>When Crone, legal boss of News Group is asked about the terms of a pay-off to Glenn Mulcaire, a former investigations contractor who has been imprisoned for carrying out tasks from which his company profited, and he claims he doesn’t know what those terms were (although he’s very sure that Mulcaire did not sign any non-disclosure agreement), you have to conclude either that he is suffering from severe amnesia and should instantly be relieved of his post, or that he is not telling the truth.</p>
<p>He directed the MPs to ask Stuart Kuttner.</p>
<p>When Kuttner told the MPs, confirming that an arrangement <em>had </em>been made with Glenn Mulcaire, he too was utterly unfamiliar with the terms, conditions and size of the pay-off, and that he didn’t know who in an organisation of which he has been Managing Editor for 22 years was responsible for making such arrangements, you have to conclude that he has become insane – for imagining that any rational person would believe him.</p>
<p>When Andy Coulson tells his questioners that he has no recollection whatever of a story, flagged on the front page of an issue of the paper that he’d edited, occupying the whole of Page 7, depicting a verbatim transcript of a message left by one prince on another prince’s voicemail, knowing that not a single person in the Wilson Room in Portcullis House, or viewing the session on Parliament TV, or in the evening news broadcasts would believe him, you a have to conclude that here is a youngish man who sees his whole future in jeopardy if he breaks and admits to a scintilla of knowledge of the phone-hacking that was involved in acquiring the story.</p>
<p>It was very clear that before the three men came in to answer the awkward questions that would be put to them, they had agreed between themselves that they would simply declare either that they didn’t know the answers or that they couldn’t remember the events.</p>
<p>Although this made them look utterly ridiculous, and Tom Crone, as a senior media lawyer, a disgrace to his profession, they knew, if they toughed it out, there was little the MPs could do, for, naturally, there was never a paper trail to confirm the involvement of any of them in the Goodman/Mulcaire case – and short of getting them to submit to US Intelligence gathering techniques on the waterboard, there was nothing more the committee could do to extract the <em>verité</em>.</p>
<p>It was a sad day for British justice and the state of British popular journalism.</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=943&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/943/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DID THE SCREWS FAKE THE PAKISTANI SPOT-FIXING EVIDENCE?</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/937</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/937#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 15:51:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fake video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mazher Mahmood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pakistan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spot-fixing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=937</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks very much as if the News of the  World, along with their thousands  of other illegal acts, have faked the evidence of  their  biggest story last year. Half the video they initially put up was taken down after I questioned  its validity. What remains  could easily have been re-voiced, or filmed retrospectively &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It looks very much as if the News of the  World, along with their thousands  of other illegal acts, have faked the evidence of  their  biggest story last year. Half the video they initially put up was taken down after I questioned  its validity. What remains  could easily have been re-voiced, or filmed retrospectively &#8211; in other words, <em><strong>after</strong></em> the no-balls had occurred. In any event it is clear  that no one could possibly have profited from an investment  of £15oK and the whole story was a construct by Mazher Mahmood, who has run  similar scams  many times  before, often with  co-operation from the  Met. Talk about sleeping with the enemy&#8230;&#8230;..The News of the  World is a criminal organisation which should be banged up  as soon as possible.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=937&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/937/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Neville &#8216;Onan the Barbarian&#8217; Thurlbeck &#8211; not hard at work</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/900</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/900#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exposed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neville Thurlbeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is what Neville Thurlbeck &#8211; recently arrested for questioning by MET officers on the  phone-hacking investigation &#8211; does for a living. Actually, that&#8217;s not quite true &#8211; here he is, just about to enjoy one of the perks of the job &#8211; as News of the World Hacks have been doing for years while they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is what Neville Thurlbeck &#8211; recently arrested for questioning by MET officers on the  phone-hacking investigation &#8211; does for a living. Actually, that&#8217;s not quite true &#8211; here he is, just about to enjoy one of the perks of the job &#8211; as News of the World Hacks have been doing for years while they  scour Britain for the muckiest rubbish they can think of.</p>
<p>I hope this doesn&#8217;t spoil your  breakfast, but it&#8217;s important we should know how diligently  this man goes about his work. &#8211; before we judge him too harshly.</p>
<p style="text-align: center; "><img class="size-medium wp-image-901" title="Neville in not much for blog" src="http://www.peterburden.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Neville-in-not-much-for-blog1-300x251.jpg" alt="Neville Thurlbeck girds his loins for another hard day at the Muck Face." width="300" height="251" /></p>
<div class="mceTemp mceIEcenter">
<dl id="attachment_901" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 310px;">
<dd class="wp-caption-dd" style="text-align: left; ">Neville Thurlbeck girds his loins for another hard day at the Muck Face.</dd>
</dl>
</div>
<p>Thurlbeck is  the hard-nosed  hack who usually handles the dirtier celebrity shag&#8217;n'brag  stories for the News of the World. A sting went badly wrong for him a few years ago. He’d set out to expose a naturists’ boarding house whose owners allegedly offered ‘extra’ sexual services to guests. Having made his investigations, Thurlbeck carelessly forgot to ‘make his excuses and leave’ (in the time-honoured News of the World manner). Instead, no doubt to his eternal regret, he made his excuses and came. He was  caught on film begging the couple to have sex while he stood at the foot of their bed, exposed what, in its primmer days, the News of the World would have called his ‘manhood’ and indulged in an unmistakable act of onanism. Since the film was posted on the internet to the delight of his fascinated colleagues, it was inevitable that sooner or later the moniker ‘Onan the Barbarian’, bestowed on him by an uncharitable ex-colleague, would stick.</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=900&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/900/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Screws to sack Onan Thurlbeck?</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/893</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/893#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2011 17:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Coulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neville Thurlbeck]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebekah Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rebekah &#8216;Testarossa&#8217; Brooks will have to think hard before she allows Screws editor, little Colin Myler to sack Neville &#8216;Onan the Barbarian&#8217; Thurlbeck for his clear involvement in criminal activity. He has been part of the evil cabal at the centre of Britain’s most evil newspaper for a long time – a lot longer than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebekah &#8216;Testarossa&#8217; Brooks will have to think hard before she allows Screws editor, little Colin Myler to sack Neville &#8216;Onan the Barbarian&#8217; Thurlbeck for his clear involvement in criminal activity. He has been part of the evil cabal at the centre of Britain’s most evil newspaper for a long time – a lot longer than recently fired Ian Edmondson. And he knows an awful lot about the illicit information gathering techniques of the paper’s hacks, which of them have done it and when. He has committed other crimes too.…. He told Mr Justice Eady in the High Court that he had no idea where the story about Prince William leaving a jokey message on Prince Harry’s voicemail had come from. It could only have been acquired by illegal hacking; he knew this – his by-line headed the story.</p>
<p>Telling lies to judges in court is an imprisonable offence.</p>
<p>If Rebekah decides he has to go, he’s going to cost Master James an awful lot in ‘be discreet’ money. We’ve never heard how much his former dodgy colleague, managing editor for 25 years, Stuart Kuttner was awarded when he was sacked (to get this arch-organizer of illicit practices out of the way before the dung hit the windmill).</p>
<p>Have the MET raided his gaffe yet, I wonder? Not too late, DAC Sue Akers.</p>
<p>What next?</p>
<p>If Ian Edmondson was involved, so was Andy Coulson</p>
<p>If Andy Coulson was involved, so was Rebekah Brooks.</p>
<p>If Rebekah Brooks was involved, so was Master James.</p>
<p>And if they were, it’s very likely that Les Hinton, CEO of The Wall Street Journal (the brightest bird in Rupert Murdoch’s bush), was involved, too, becasue he was Executive Chairman of News International at the time.</p>
<p> And then there’s the Fake Sheikh, the nation’s most mendacious hack……</p>
<p>Watch my next blog….</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=893&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/893/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>As Jeremy Vagina looks into the Abyss</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/869</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/869#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2011 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Top Rundown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Hunt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jeremy Vagina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rebekah Brooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Testarossa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=869</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of all the poisoned chalices to be passed by a much-loved colleague &#8212; Should the government allow the venal and highly self-interested News Corp to dominate the British news agenda by giving them control over a significant share of the news outlet? &#8212; the BSkyB decision could not have been more sensitive, especially when the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of all the poisoned chalices to be passed by a much-loved colleague &#8212; Should the government allow the venal and highly self-interested News Corp to dominate the British news agenda by giving them control over a significant share of the news outlet? &#8212; the BSkyB decision could not have been more sensitive, especially when the boss is so obviously in lerve with the Testarossa &#8211; Rebekah the Larrikin &#8211; accepting her invitations; inviting her round, too, from time to time for quite intimate gatherings. She probably loves the intellectual stimulation, which she doesn&#8217;t get from hubby, Charlie &#8216;Bonker&#8217; Brooks.</p>
<p>It all smells pretty nasty, Young Vagina, so chuck away the nose peg, and send Ol&#8217; Rumplechops and his billions packing. If you don&#8217;t, you&#8217;ll look as big a fool as your boss does just now over his &#8216;loyalty&#8217; to Andy C.</p>
<p>And you don&#8217;t want that, do you?</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=869&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/869/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Goodbye Andy</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/861</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/861#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 12:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Coulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cameron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resignation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andy Coulson has finally bowed to the inevitable and walked from his job in Downing Street. Mr Cameron’s judgement would have been called into question less if the decision had come from him, before he went to Downing Street.
But what next?
Andy Coulson, called as a witness in the perjury trial of Scottish politician Tommy Sheridan [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andy Coulson has finally bowed to the inevitable and walked from his job in Downing Street. Mr Cameron’s judgement would have been called into question less if the decision had come from him, before he went to Downing Street.</p>
<p>But what next?</p>
<p>Andy Coulson, called as a witness in the perjury trial of Scottish politician Tommy Sheridan at the end of last year, declared under oath that he had no knowledge of all the phone-hacking that was going on at the <strong><em>News of the World</em></strong> when he was in charge there.</p>
<p>Over the last 18 months, since he blatantly dissembled in front of the Commons Culture Media Sport committee, it has become increasingly unlikely that this is true.</p>
<p>Could another perjury trial now be on the horizon?</p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=861&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/861/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Les Hinton in Court</title>
		<link>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/858</link>
		<comments>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/858#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 09:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Coulson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Les Hinton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[phone hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rupert Murdoch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.peterburden.net/?p=858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier this week, the Chief Executive Officer of New York based Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal  was sitting in a London Court room listening to proceedings in a claim being made against the News of the World over tacky (and illegal) news-gathering practices. Why on earth, you might ask, would this very high-ranking US media executive [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier this week, the Chief Executive Officer of New York based Dow Jones/Wall Street Journal  was sitting in a London Court room listening to proceedings in a claim being made against the <em>News of the World </em>over tacky (and illegal) news-gathering practices. Why on earth, you might ask, would this very high-ranking US media executive care whether or not a private investigator from Cheam had hacked into the voice-mail of British football agent, Skylet Andrew?</p>
<p> <strong><em>Answer:</em></strong> Because that executive is Les Hinton, former Executive Chairman of News International in London, at the time when two men were caught and jailed for phone-hacking, of which, he claimed at the time and since to the Commons CMS Committee, that he, the editor Andy Coulson, and every other executive and senior journalist at the paper had absolutely no knowledge.</p>
<p>Now that it’s clear that dozens of senior staff and employees of the paper not only had knowledge of what the ‘one rogue journalist’ was doing, but were all busy doing it themselves, it begins to look as if perhaps Les did know more than he was admitting, perhaps even to the extent that he could be deemed complicit – even a co-conspirator in plans to invade the voice-mails of hundreds, possibly thousands, of targets deemed newsworthy by the paper.</p>
<p> As current head of a newspaper which is the most illustrious in the News Corp stable and is also Rupert Murdoch’s most cherished possession, one can imagine that there is serious pressure on Hinton not to be shown to be party to such sordid little crimes. That was why he is taking such an interest in this and no doubt all the dozens of other cases which are ranged up against the <em>News of the World</em> by those seeking recompense for the paper’s criminal violation of their right to privacy.</p>
<p> <strong><em>Best of Luck, Les!</em></strong></p>
<img src="http://www.peterburden.net/?ak_action=api_record_view&id=858&type=feed" alt="" />]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.peterburden.net/archives/858/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

